No. 18-5294
Herbert Pridgen v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: adjudication appeal appellate-procedure appellate-review circuit-court-error civil-procedure criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel insufficient-judgment judicial-review jurisdiction legal-adjudication procedural-defect sentencing
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Did the Circuit Court error in its opinion when it failed to properly address the four issues raised on appeal for adjudication giving a insufficent judgment on the matters presented.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Circuit Court err in its opinion when it failed to properly address the four issues raised on appeal for adjudication, giving an insufficient judgment on the matters presented?
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-06-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 20, 2018)
Attorneys
Herbert Pridgen
Herbert Pridgen — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent