No. 18-5292
Armando Angeles v. United States
Tags: circuit-court-interpretation circuit-split criminal-procedure fourth-amendment lane-maintenance search-and-seizure state-court-interpretation state-federal-court-tension statutory-interpretation suppression-motion traffic-laws traffic-statute traffic-stop
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, when affirming the denial of Mr. Angeles' motion to suppress, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in applying the Kansas Supreme Court's interpretation of a Kansas traffic statute governing the failure to maintain a lane, an error that also implicates divergent views of similar statutes nationwide?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in applying the Kansas Supreme Court's interpretation of a Kansas traffic statute governing the failure to maintain a lane
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 24, 2018)
2018-05-16
Application (17A1271) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until July 16, 2018.
2018-05-01
Application (17A1271) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 17, 2018 to July 16, 2018, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Armando Angeles
John Carl Arceci — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent