No. 18-5290

Ronald Long v. George Robinson, Administrator, Northern State Prison, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-procedure civil-procedure corrections due-process parole presentence-report standing state-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Did the N.J. State Parole Board deny Petitioner Due Process by conducting a parole hearing without having a mandatory presentence report?

2) Did the N.J. Department of Corrections deny Petitioner Due Process by denying reduced custody status without having a mandatory presentence report?

3) Did the District Court err by erecting a procedural bar to the state's denial of its own laws and rules which require a mandatory presentence investigation and presentence report?

4) Does the mandatory nature of a presentence report state a valid Due Process right?

5) Did the Circuit Court err by denying a certificate of appealability and rehearing?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the N.J. State Parole deny Petitioner Due Process by conducting a parole hearing without having a mandatory presentence report?

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-30
Waiver of right of respondent George Robinson, et al. to respond filed.
2018-06-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 20, 2018)

Attorneys

George Robinson, et al.
Mario C. Formica — Respondent
Ronald Long
Ronald Long — Petitioner