Is it an important issue of Law and Fact For the Purpose of Review at court when the highest court failed to uphold its own prior precedent case Law decision, concerning the proper mechanism For Judicial review of a lower courts opposing that higher court's case law decision?

2) Is it a reviewable Fact of Law, in the interest of the Public, that, there openly exist a conspiracy in the state courts, to openly deny Petitioner-as a prisoner-Access to court-due process of Law- Equal Treatment, where the trial court issues a court order dismissing Petitioner's complaint Finding it without merit, without reviewing the Evidence, without Holding in Form of Hearing?

3) Is it a reviewable error for the Oregon court of Appeals to affirm without opinion, a nonenforceble court order; which it had Previously gave the trial Leave to Fix, to make it a Judgment?

4) Is it reviewable issue, For the Oregon supreme court to Fail to reverse the court of appeal-where the court of appeal ruled in its order that the trial court order was erroneous-but Affirmed it without opinion?

Whether the Oregon courts failed to properly apply precedent case law regarding the proper mechanism for judicial review of a lower court's decision opposing a higher court's case law decision