Ground One
The District Court, Appeals Court for the Districtof Columbia Circuit committed reversible legal error, by improperly categorizing and misappling exemption 5 U.S.C.552a(j)(2), and inaccurately interpreting its meaning against Marino. And then improperly & unconstitutionally using it against Marino's FOIA/PA Requests, " without any due process of law & without any transparent corresponding accountability, is not harmless error & violated Marino's substantial rights & Due Process and FOIA/PA congressional intent to pierce the veil of Administrative Secrecy and Open Agency action to the light of public scrutiny; Dep't of State v. Ray,' 502 U.S. 164, 173, 112 S.Ct. 541, 116 L.Ed.2d 526 (1991) In Violations of Title 5 U.S.C.552 & 552a, Fifth Amendment's Due Process & Access to the Courts & First Amendment's Freedom of Speech;

Ground Two
The District Court, Appeals Court for the District of Columbia Circuit committed reversible legal error by failing to compel the Defendants/Appellee(s) Dep't of Justice & its components to comply with its statutory congressional intent of the FOIA/PA Act's intent was enacted to facilitate public access to Government documents in which Marino pointed to specific documents that are in the Public Domain & Public Record and that Marino pointed to specific information in the Public Domain that is identical to the being withheld, and that the Appellee(s) failed to comply; violated Statutory Law Title 5 U.S.C.552 & 552a

Ground Three
The District Court & Appeals Court for the District of Columbia Circuit committed reversible legal error by failing to compel the Defendant Agencies: Dep't of Jusitice, FBI, EOUSA's, USAO/D.Mass/ OIP/to perform corrective action under the Privacy Act Title 5 U.S.C. §552a(d)(l)-(3). The Privacy Act ensures that an individual (Marino) can access his records and request amendment of those records to correct any inaccuracies. A civil action is available to correct an (VERDICT FORM DOCUMENT: 1079, via: 97-cr-40009-NMG. (D.Mass)) Inaccurate record that an agency (Defendants/Appellee(s) supra) has not complied. 5 u.s.c.S552a(g)(l)(A)-(B). See Marino v. USAO/D.Mass, et al., (District of Columbia) "consolidated with" Marino V. Dep't of Justice, et al., 12-cv-865-RMC. (D.c.2012); Marino v. Dep't of Justice, et al., USCA'S #16-5280 (D.c.Cir.2016); Records are in the Public Domain, Marino pointed to specific records identical what he requests to be corrected, see Exhibit: 3, violated FOIA/PA Statutes, see supra;

Ground Four
The Appeals Court District of Columbia three judge panel & 11 judge panel sitting En Banc, committed reversible legal error by failing to review Defendants/Appellee(s) newly filed Declaration of Susanne Husted, dated: January 19th, 2018, stated in Exhibits: 5-9, a Chron

Whether the district court and appeals court erred in improperly categorizing and misapplying FOIA/Privacy Act exemptions, failing to compel agency compliance with statutory requirements, and denying due process and access to public records