James McCray v. S. L. Burt, Warden
WHETHER THE SIXTH CIRCUIT DECISION IS OBJECTIVELY UNREASONABLE AS A MATTER OF DUE PROCESS, BECAUSE MCCRAY SENTENCING GUIDELINES OFFENSE VARIABLE[S] WAS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY SCORED A TOTAL OF 40 POINTS, WHERE ANY FACT FOUND BY JUDGE THAT INCREASE THE MINIMUM SENTENCE GUIDELINES, NOT BY JURY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, OR ADMITTED BY THE DEFENDANT VIOLATES THE 6TH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?
Whether the Sixth Circuit decision is objectively unreasonable as a matter of due process, because McCray's sentencing guidelines offense variable(s) was unconstitutionally scored a total of 40 points, where any fact found by judge that increases the minimum sentence guidelines, not by jury beyond a reasonable doubt, or admitted by the defendant violates the 6th Amendment to the United States Constitution