No. 18-5245
Jesus M. Rios-Ramos v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act beckles-precedent beckles-v-united-states career-offender career-offender-guideline criminal-law due-process johnson-precedent johnson-v-united-states residual-clause sentencing sentencing-guidelines vagueness
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Court should address the application and contours of the residual clause of the Career Offender guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, in light of Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. _,135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015), Beckles v. United States, _U.S. _, 137 S.Ct. 886 (2017), and Sessions v. Dimaya, U.S. _S.Ct. __ (2018).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Supreme Court should address the application and contours of the residual clause of the Career Offender guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, in light of Johnson v. United States, Beckles v. United States, and Sessions v. Dimaya
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 16, 2018)
Attorneys
Jesus Rios-Ramos
Rachel Brill — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent