Sharon K. Bland v. Gellman, Brydges & Schroff, et al.
Is New York State Workers' Compensation Law Constitutional? Does the government have the right to take away my cause of action and substitute it with a lesser mismanaged authority?
1. Due to conflict between the 6th Ohio, Michigan), 'Jth(linois), Oth (Oregon, Montana), 10 (Colorado), and 11th 5
®lorida) Circuits regarding the constitutionality of various provisions of Workers
Compensation Law under "Exclusivity", all of which apply to Petitioner in the 274 (New Yor)
Circuit, where:
a. Lack of a severability clause in the New York Workers Compensation Law requires the law 5
to be struck down on the same grounds which the State of New York has failed to address;
b. The Constitutional Challenges of which reflect a clear imbalance, nationally, in the 5
Compensation Bargain, thus challenging the current equity in the contract of
"Exclusivity" originally envisioned under NY Central Railroad v. White (Exh. 9);
c. Which no longer provides a public service to justify the "TAKING". (Exh. 10-15). 5
2. Does Workers Compensation Law as a legal premise violate Petitioner's personal rights, 5
and/or the fundamental rights of Injured Workers, most specifically Disabled Workers?
a. Is Workers Compensation Law's premise of exclusivity valid & useful,
Is New York State Workers' Compensation Law Constitutional?