No. 18-5234
Marcos Rodriguez v. United States
Relisted (3)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-924c3b co-defendant-motions criminal-law due-process federal-criminal-procedure legal-joinder second-amendment sentencing statutory-interpretation void-for-vagueness
Latest Conference:
2019-06-27
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the 'risk of force' clause of 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(3)(B) is void for vagueness.
Whether the granting of a request to join in motions of a co-defendant is sufficient to assert defenses raised in a pending motion by that co-defendant.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 'risk of force' clause of 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(3)(B) is void for vagueness
Docket Entries
2019-07-30
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2019-06-28
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of United States v. Davis, 588 U. S. ___ (2019).
2019-06-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2019.
2018-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-09
Rescheduled.
2018-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-12
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2018-09-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 12, 2018.
2018-09-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 12, 2018 to October 12, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-08-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 12, 2018.
2018-08-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 13, 2018 to September 12, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-07-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 13, 2018)
Attorneys
Marcos Rodriguez
Tina Schneider — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent