No. 18-5223
Gerand Earl Ratcliff v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment appellate-review civil-rights consent-search consent-to-search constitutional-rights deferential-review due-process fact-finding schneckloth-v-bustamonte standard-of-review voluntariness-standard
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-11-09
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is the voluntariness of consent to search a question of fact that is subject to the same deferential review as findings of historical fact?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the voluntariness of consent to search a question of fact that is subject to the same deferential review as findings of historical fact?
Docket Entries
2018-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.
2018-10-23
Reply of petitioner Gerand Earl Ratcliff filed. (Distributed)
2018-10-09
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-08-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 9, 2018.
2018-08-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 7, 2018 to October 9, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-08-08
Response Requested. (Due September 7, 2018)
2018-07-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 13, 2018)
Attorneys
Gerand Earl Ratcliff
Tobie J. Smith — Federal Public Defender, NDAL, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent