No. 18-5219

Anthony Tyrone Campbell v. J. Mendez, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-exhaustion administrative-procedure administrative-remedies circuit-court-of-appeals civil-procedure civil-rights due-process excessive-force exhaustion-of-remedies judicial-review litigation-reform prison-litigation-reform-act section-1983 standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Did quH circuit Court of Appeals decision conflict with ioth circuit court of Appeals decision where determining factor significantly substantiate Plaintiff did not fail to timely exhaust administrative remedies?

2. Did Plaintiff, Pursuant to S 1997 e (a), of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, factually exhaust administrative remedies as far as available Prior to bringing forth his s 1983 civil action claim?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals decision conflicted with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision on the issue of whether the plaintiff substantially exhausted administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-16
Waiver of right of respondent J. Mendez, et al. to respond filed.
2018-02-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 13, 2018)

Attorneys

J. Mendez, et al.
Jaime Michelle GansonState of California, Attorney General's Office, Respondent