The United SHAHES APpEaLS For The Cour of FOurth Z Cirauit ENE WhEN H! P3N3HNB B ERISION in CONFLiC dEiSiON OF YN other PHND SHHES Cout ADDEaLS ON the SIME MAHERS iMpartaNt iN My from the PHHND SHAES District the EASTETN District OP Virainid CONSELiNA i Civ. P. 00 (b) mu Fed. R. amotion 25 aN 28,4.5.C UNAUthOrILEA SUCCESSiVE 2 2255 DNSSWSp Motion and it i For TaCK JUriSdiCHIoNA. The United SAES Court OF APDERLS For Fourth Circit BNN dENiEd WhEN it Fot NEhEaCiNG aNd NEEATING EN BENC by the diRECHION P E00 the thiEE DMEL Not 2 NE AUESP Δ UndEr pall h R. App P. 35 that is B A A to deT PMO mo HONS FOLI cuit OF APPEAL. OLC Faurth ODEDLS FHOr hE Coutt OF A he dENiEd For it M ING it DEPHION Mi that shauld be PPIHS bu this Dut += has BPJBP EdEral Lr aN importaNt QUESTION iN a that a CONPLIC PEENT X5 H this dELISIONS 0 COUr

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit erred in dismissing petitioner's motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion