No. 18-5170
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law agency-determination citizenship-and-naturalization-fraud citizenship-status due-process evidence evidence-standard fraud immigration immigration-law jurisdiction legal-review marriage naturalization naturalization-fraud standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether there was evidence presented at trial that petitioner was lawfully signed to Shabsan before he became Naturalized?
2. Whether an authorized Agency's finding and determination can be changed without proper evidence?
3. Whether Petitioner Me. Linz Khan committed fraud, falsely on fraud and lies through Te Wilks. Yen Hua then or act
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there was evidence presented at trial that petitioner was lawfully married to Shabana before he became naturalized?
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2018)
Attorneys
Ijaz Khan
Ijaz Khan — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent