No. 18-5162
Ellord Wells v. Mary Potter, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: due-process guilty-plea mandatory-sentence sixth-amendment trial-court appeal constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mandatory-sentence sentencing sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not arguing that the trial court failed to inform the appellant of the mandatory nature of his sentence when accepting his guilty plea.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not arguing that the trial court failed to inform the appellant of the mandatory nature of his sentence when accepting his guilty plea
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-31
Waiver of right of respondent Potter, Warden to respond filed.
2018-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2018)
Attorneys
Ellord Wells
Ellord Wells — Petitioner
Potter, Warden
Eric E. Murphy — Ohio State Solicitor, Respondent