No. 18-5154
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr. v. Jamilah A. Jefferson, et al.
IFP
Tags: 42-usc-1983 absolute-immunity civil-rights due-process fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court ninth-circuit standing statute-of-limitations
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. whether Respondentcs), a "(ivil Attorney" employed
by
the City of Oakland, CA., whom Petitioner alleges
Committed Fraud on the Court, and Petitoner, 15
Entitled to "Absolute Immunity from a 42 U.5.c. $1903
Civil Rights lawouit?
2. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Crcust's ruling lorder, stating Respondent 1s
entithed to "Absolute Immunity"is
contrary to clearly
established federal law?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a government attorney who allegedly committed fraud on the court is entitled to absolute immunity from a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-06-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2018)
Attorneys
Edward Vincent Ray
Edward Vincent Ray Jr. — Petitioner