WHETHER THE EVIDENCE ACQUIRED DURING MR. HEXIMER'S ILLEGAL DETENTION IS/WAS INADMISSIBLE UNDER CLEARLY-ESTABLISHED LAW

WHETHER THE 53RD DISTRICT MAGISTRATE HAD ABSOLUTELY NO ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE, FACTS OR TESTIMONY -- LET ALONE A COMPETENT WITNESS -BEFORE HIM TO: (A) CONFER JURISDICTION: (B) ESTABLISH THE REQUIRED • FOURTH AMENDMENT FINDING OF PROBABLE CAUSE TO CHARGE ANY CRIME(S): OR (C) ISSUE CRIMINAL PROCESS AGAINST MR. HEXIMER ?

WHETHER THE 53RD DISTRICT JUDGE HAD ABSOLUTELY NO ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE, FACTS OR TESTIMONY AT THE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION LET ALONE JURISDICTION -- TO FIND PROBABLE CAUSE THAT A CRIME WAS COMMITTED UNDER MCL § 750-157B2 OR THAT MR. HEXIMER HAD COMMITTED ANY CRIME(S) -- TO BIND THE MATTER OVER TO THE CIRCUIT COURT ?

WHETHER A CONVICTION PRONOUNCED BY THE 44TH CIRCUIT COURT WITHOUT ANY ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE, FACTS OR TESTIMONY -- AND WE WANT OF PERSONAN & SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION - IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL 7

WHETHER THE PROSECUTOR COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE COURTS, MR. HEXIMER AND PUBLIC -- WHERE THERE WAS ABSOLUTELY NO ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE, FACTS OR TESTIMONY -- LET ALONE JURISDICTION - TO PURSUE THE SOLICITATION CHARGE AGAINST MR HEXIMER (A DISABLED VETERAN) DUE TO HIS ILLEGAL DETENTION 7

WHETHER THE PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO ANSWER OR MEET ITS BURDEN OF DEMONSTRATING SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION IN ANY OF THE MICHIGAN COURTS (44Th CIRCUIT, COURT OF APPEALS, SUPREME COURT) CONSTITUTES FORFEITURE AND/OR WAIVER?

Whether the evidence acquired during Mr. Heximer's illegal detention is inadmissible under clearly-established law