No. 18-5129
Rodolfo Trejo v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing double-counting due-process eighth-amendment equal-protection immigration sentencing sentencing-disparity sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation substantive-reasonableness
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
I.- Whether Petitioner's Sentence Constitutes Impermissible Double Counting.
Whether Petitioner's Sentence is Substantively Unreasonable Under the the Totality of the Circumstances.
III.- Whether Petitioner's Sentence Created an Unwarranted Sentencing Disparity.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's Sentence Constitutes Impermissible Double Counting
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-06-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2018)
Attorneys
Rodolfo Trejo
Rodolfo Trejo — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent