No. 18-5127
Martinez Orlando Black v. North Carolina
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process felony-classification habitual-offender ineffective-assistance-of-counsel juvenile-delinquency prior-conviction recidivism sentencing sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the failure of defense counsel to object to the increase in Petitioner's sentence into the "aggravated range" at Felony Class C, by use of a prior juvenile delinquency conviction, constitute Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, because the Petitioner did not commit a Class C felony?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the failure of defense counsel to object to the increase in Petitioner's sentence into the 'aggravated range' at Felony Class C, by use of a prior juvenile delinquency conviction, constitute Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, because the Petitioner did not commit a Class C felony?
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-01-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2018)
Attorneys
Martinez Orlando Black