No. 18-5117
Glendrict Frazier v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: anders-motion anders-v-california appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rule criminal-procedure direct-appeal direct-review due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance retroactivity
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Appeals Court Follow the Ruling in Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328, 107 S.Ct. 708 (1987)(holding that on direct review a new constitutional rule must be applied retroactively "to all cases not yet final") When attorney explained that in his opinion there were no non frivolous grounds for appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Appeals Court Follow the Ruling in Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328, 107 S.Ct. 708 (1987) (holding that on direct review a new constitutional rule must be applied retroactively to all cases not yet final)
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2017-12-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2018)
Attorneys
Glendrict Frazier
Glendrict Frazier — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent