No. 18-5110
Abron Spraggins v. Rusty Washburn, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review cause-and-prejudice civil-rights constitutional-claims criminal-procedure due-process federal-claim federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prior-decisions procedural-default state-appellate-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
IS THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS REGARDING THE PROCEDURAL DEFAULT OF PETITIONER'S INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL CLAIMS IN CONFLICT WITH OR INCONSISTENT WITH PRIOR DECISIONS OF THIS COURT?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the decision of the court of appeals regarding the procedural default of petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claims in conflict with or inconsistent with prior decisions of this court?
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent Rusty Washburn to respond filed.
2018-05-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2018)
Attorneys
Abron Spraggins
Abron Spraggins — Petitioner
Rusty Washburn
John Henry Bledsoe III — Office of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent