No. 18-5098
Thaddeus Williams v. Cindi S. Curtin, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal certificate-of-appealability district-court-review due-process equitable-tolling habeas-corpus procedural-timeliness statutory-tolling
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT CORRECTLY DETERMINED THAT PETITIONER'S HABEAS CORPUS PETITION WAS. UNTIMELY; WHETHER THE BLANKET DENIAL OF. HIS MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY DENIED HIM THE RIGHT TO APPEAL AND AN OPPORTUNITY TO ESTABLISH EQUITABLE .OR:STATUTORY TOLLING.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court correctly determined that petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely; whether the blanket denial of his motion for certificate of appealability denied him the right to appeal and an opportunity to establish equitable or statutory tolling
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-23
Waiver of right of respondent Cindi S. Curtin, Warden to respond filed.
2018-06-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2018)
Attorneys
Cindi S. Curtin, Warden
Aaron David Lindstrom — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Thaddeus Williams
Thaddeus Williams — Petitioner