No. 18-5097
Antonio Torres v. United States
Tags: criminal-activity defendant-role mitigating-role paid-tasks proprietary-interest rebuttable-presumption sentencing-guidelines sentencing-reduction
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 now contains a rebuttable presumption that a mitigating role reduction should be granted upon a showing by the defendant that he did not have a proprietary interest in the criminal activity and was simply being paid to perform certain tasks.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 now contains a rebuttable presumption that a mitigating role reduction should be granted upon a showing by the defendant that he did not have a proprietary interest in the criminal activity and was simply being paid to perform certain tasks
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2018-06-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2018)
Attorneys
Antonio Torres
John Andrew Kuchera — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent