WAS THE PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO AFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL IN HIS FIRST DIRECT APPEAL OF RIGHT VIOLATED WHEN COUNSEL REFUSED TO BRIEF HIS FOURTH AMENDMENT ISSULE?

2. IS A WARRANTLESS SEARCH OF A PROBATIONER'S PREMISES IN VIOLATION OF STATE LAW STATUTES PER S PE UNREASONABLE

3. WHERE PETITIONER WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENLED FOR POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED OF THE SAME SUBSTANCE PROHIBITED BY U.S. CONSTUTUTION AMGNDMENTS E V?

4. VIDLATE THE DUE PRDCESS IF THE ANSWER TO QUESTION #4 AROVE I5 NDL, WAS PETITIONER DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL ?

Whether the petitioner's right to effective assistance of counsel in his first direct appeal of right was violated when counsel refused to brief his Fourth Amendment claim