No. 18-5062
Norman L. Hunter v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aged-offenses appellate-review career-offender civil-procedure criminal-history district-court-error due-process guideline-determination sentencing-enhancement sentencing-factors sentencing-guidelines standing writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Should a writ of certiorari be granted to determine whether the district court erred in sentencing Hunter as a career offender when the offenses utilized to enhance his sentence were aged and not considered part of the guideline determination?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in sentencing the petitioner as a career offender when the offenses used to enhance the sentence were aged and not considered part of the guideline determination
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-06-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2018)
Attorneys
Norman Hunter
Norman Hunter — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent