No. 18-5049

Leroy Lamont Wells v. Collette Peters, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-06-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus jurisdiction opinions standing takings
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) In USCA9 NO. 17-35696, Wells v. ReteRS, etal DOeS ORDER FILOD MAY25, 2018 and ORDOR FILED JanvaRy 24, 2018 comply with FedeRal Rulas of Appellate PRocecluRe, Rule 32(d)?

2) Must the Court strike an unsigned papeR that is oRoe derying Appellant's MotoN to peoceed in forMa pAupetis F JANUARy 24,2018, and ORDER Dening the pending motons to reinstat, to reconsider and for a stay of mandate, and motion forjudica/ Notice and issuance of mandate forthuith FileD MAy25, 2018 in USCA9 N. M7-35696, WEll v. PeteLS,etal.?

3) IF Appen in U9No.7359, Wels v.PeeR,ea/ timey CMPES WT CLRKS ORDER TO SHW CAUE wth Respect to Motion to proceecl in forma pauperis, may te cek nohtndngonce, dis the appeal for lack of prosecstion?

4) Is De C y C JUDGE OR APPELLATE COMMISSIONER TO ISSUE ORDEL OISMISSING USCA9 No. 17-35b96 whoe Appellant wells Reques fed Relief Revoked such leave?

5) In NiNth Cnnf louf, Must MotioN for lene to proceed in forma pApeRs in cin/ cases be present to Tuo and TheoeTe'd

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Leroy Lamont Wells v. Colleen TC Peters

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-05
Waiver of right of respondents Collette Peters, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2018-05-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2018)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Collette Peters, et al.
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Leroy Lamont Wells
Leroy Lamont Wells — Petitioner