In United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), United States v. Rita, 551 U.S. 338 (2007) and United States v. Gall, 552 U.S. 38 (2007), this Court has ruled consistently that an active prision sentence must be reasonable under the "Due Process Clause". Did the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erroneously denied amotion where petitioner showed a new evidence to give an inmediatly release for. petitioner due the violation of the Due Process rights clause?

Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erroneously denied a motion where the petitioner showed new evidence to warrant an immediate release due to a violation of the Due Process rights clause