No. 18-5038
IFP
Tags: administrative-law child-pornography circuit-court-split civil-procedure due-process equal-protection federal-rules-of-evidence-403 federal-rules-of-evidence-414 standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Honorable Court should resolve the differing applications of the Circuit Courts as it applies to the use of Federal Rule of Evidence 414 and its balancing test under the Federal Rule of Evidence 403 to a uniform standard of review?
Whether the differing applications of the Circuit Courts balancing tests resulted in a violation the petitioner's rights afforded by the United States Constitution under the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the differing applications of the Circuit Courts' balancing tests under Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 414 resulted in a violation of the petitioner's rights afforded by the Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution
Docket Entries
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-08-29
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-07-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 29, 2018.
2018-07-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 30, 2018 to August 29, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2018)
Attorneys
Neil Sweeney
Joan M Fund — Petitioner
United States, Joan
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent