William Robert Dixon v. Robert LeGrand, Warden, et al.
1} Does violation of right to access the court measure constitutional violation? [Alone before review.]
2} If a violation to access the court takes place outside the original courts jurisdiction who then has jurisdiction to correct the claim?
3} After the acknowledgment of the violation, which court has jurisdiction of the claim?
4} If the original court denied any co-operation does the second court where the jurisdiction of the violation took place have authority to correct it's due process?
5} Can illegal sentence outside statute be issued and continued?
6} Once an illegal sentence is given, raised and then recognized as illegal, Isn't the duty mandatory under equal protection to correct the violation of statute and constitution?
7} Is any sentence outside statute void and nullity?
8} If one is deprived the opportunity to exhaust or complete last level of appeal on any due process, shouldn't the attempt satisfy, the standard to gain review?
Does violation of right to access the court measure constitutional violation?