No. 18-5017

Glenn Lee Selden v. Elizabeth A. Kovachevich, Judge, United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2018-06-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights commercial-contract constitutional-provisions criminal-forfeiture due-process false-name-registration government-authority legal-counsel military-appeal national-security standing takings
Latest Conference: 2018-11-16 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

WILL COURT ENFORCE A COMMERCIAL CONTRACT?

THE UNITED STATES IS UNDER NUCLEAR ASSULT AND THE PUBLIC IS IN GRAVE DANGER

WILL COURT GRANT MILITARY APPEAL ART V SEC I R. 10 + 1 AND LIFT ILLEGAL SANCTIONS?

WILL COURT RESTORE TRUST AGENT TO HIS ORIGINAL POSITION- REMOVE FRAUD TRUSTEES- RELEASE A HOSTAGE- CONDITION MY BOND - GRANT FINES FEES AND AWARDS DUE ME - ASSIGN AN AUDIT COMMITTEE FOR U.S. RECOVERY AND DAMAGES- AND PRESERVE ANYTHING NOT MENTIONED IN MOTION

WILL COURT UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION- GRANT LEGAL COUNSEL- ACCEPT TESTIMONY FROM A UNITED STATES DEFENSE WITNESS WITH NO CHARGES AGAINST HIS LEGAL NAME- 13 YEARS A HOSTAGE- AND PROVIDE DUE PROCESS?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court will enforce a commercial contract when the United States is under nuclear assault and the public is in grave danger

Docket Entries

2018-11-19
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2018-10-31
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2018-10-24
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2018-10-01
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-06-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2018)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Glenn Lee Selden
Glenn Lee Selden — Petitioner