The United States Solicitor General waived his right to respond on 11-23-2015 in this Court's Case 15-6929 to the Petitioner's claim for refund for tax years 2004, 2009, 2011, 2012 and 2013 totaling $51,068.84 plus interest. Why has Petitioner not received the federal tax refund as claimed in that case on 11-9-2015 (See Appendix A pages oneand two, Appendices D4, D5, Fl, F2, Gi, G2, Hl, II, 13)?

How is simultaneously possible that Petitioner's 2004 final joint marital tax return shows self assessed tax of $37,483.90, the IRS 2004 account transcripts page one for Petitioner's 2004 final joint marital tax shows 2004 tax return filed 4-15-2005 tax per return records $37,483.90 and the IRS can falsely states on 4-29-2014 that "Petitioner self assessed taxes in the amount of $42,117.85". (See Appendix I pages one through six)

How is simultaneously possible that Petitioner's 2004 final joint marital tax return shows self assessed tax of $37,483.90, the IRS 2004 account transcripts page one for Petitioner's 2004 finaljoint;rnarl tax shows 2004 tax return filed 4-15-2005 tax per return $37,483.90 and The IRS can then contradictorily states on page two of the IRS 2004 tax year transcripts for Petitioner "tax per return $42,117.85" (See Appendix I pages one through six and J pages one through six)?

Wouldn't the failure of the United States in accordance with rules of civil procedure 11.13 to deny it's falsification of a taxpayer's tax year transcripts in over 14 years of proceedings show intent in it's collection of unlawful tax in the amount of $4,633.95 plus interest since 2005? (Appendicies I and J)

4. When you show the two statements that are in contradiction, Senate Hearings on the Judiciary, 8933, 1950 does not that raise the implication of the presence of all the necessary elements of a crime?" (appendices I and J)

Is the Commissioner of Internal Revenue required to treat similarly situated persons equally in refunding the joint marital tax refund for the final year of marital status if the joint marital tax refund is made during a year which the status of the taxpayer is now single as known by the Commissioner? (See Appendices I and J)

How is it simultaneously possible that the Final Order on the Dissolution of Marriage of Petitioner for the final joint marital tax year 2004, (the determination of the distribution of those marital assets / liabilities) the State of Florida Ordered Petitioner paid no marital debt while $42,273.56 is simultaneously and contradictorily recorded as joint martial 2004 1040 tax payments by the United States for Petitioner's 2004 tax transcripts? (See appendices, I, J and K)

How is the State of Florida's granting a lien on Petitioner's homestead without her knowledge or consent to a state of Florida elected government official on March 15, 2015, and in March 2006 vali

Whether the IRS has unlawfully denied the petitioner's tax refund claim, falsified tax transcripts, and improperly recorded marital tax liabilities