No. 18-5008
Autrey Canadate v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act armed-robbery attempted-armed-robbery attempted-robbery certificate-of-appealability curtis-johnson-v-united-states due-process elements-clause florida-criminal-law use-of-force violent-felony violent-force
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether reasonable jurists could debate whether the Florida offense of
attempted armed robbery, Fla. Stat. § 812.13, categorically requires the use of
"violent force," as defined in Curtis Johnson v. United States, 559 U.S. 133, 140
(2010), so as to qualify as a "violent felony" under the elements clause of the Armed
Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Florida offense of attempted armed robbery categorically requires the use of 'violent force' to qualify as a 'violent felony' under the Armed Career Criminal Act
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-09
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-10-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 9, 2018.
2018-10-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 10, 2018 to November 9, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-09-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 10, 2018.
2018-09-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 10, 2018 to October 10, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-08-10
Response Requested. (Due September 10, 2018)
2018-08-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-06-26
Attorneys
Autrey Canadate
Robin Farnsworth — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent