Was counsel's decision to forego utilizing a DNA expert defense witness and agreeing to the government's stipulation of Tribal Enrollment a reasonable exercise of professional judgment under Strickland?

Are the government's stipulations of Tribal Enrollment sufficient to sustain a conviction under the Indian Major Crimes Act?

Is the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeal's decision contrary to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal's precedent-setting decision in United States v. Bruce or the United States Supreme Court's 172-year-old decision in United States v. Rogers?

Does the Court of Appeals err in failing to issue a Certificate of Appealability and/or order an evidentiary hearing on a Petitioner's claims of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and a Due Process violation where the government has failed to prove all elements under the Indian Major Crimes Act and Petitioner has DNA evidence supporting his claim of actual innocence?

Was counsel's decision to forego utilizing a DNA expert defense witness and agreeing to the government's stipulation of Tribal Enrollment a reasonable exercise of professional judgment under Strickland?