No. 18-494
Response Waived
Tags: 17-usc-106 17-usc-501 copyright-infringement copyright-ownership eleventh-circuit exclusive-rights motion-to-dismiss standard-of-review statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit correctly held that granting defendant's Motion for Dismissal was justified even though a) plaintiff proved ownership of copyrights that were the subject of the Complaint, and b) plaintiff alleged at least one violation of his rights established by 17 U.S.C. § 106, 17 U.S.C. § 501(a).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit correctly held that granting defendant's Motion for Dismissal was justified even though a) plaintiff proved ownership of copyrights that were the subject of the Complaint, and b) plaintiff alleged at least one violation of his rights established by 17 U.S.C. § 106, 17 U.S.C. § 501(a)
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent Apple, Inc. to respond filed.
2018-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 16, 2018)
Attorneys
Apple, Inc.
Catherine Emily Stetson — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Respondent
Thomas S. Ross
Thomas S. Ross — Petitioner