No. 18-440
Edward Michael Nero, et al. v. Marilyn J. Mosby
Response Waived
Tags: absolute-immunity advocacy-function civil-procedure civil-rights due-process investigation investigatory-materials law-enforcement legal-advice probable-cause prosecutor prosecutor-investigation prosecutorial-immunity standing
Latest Conference:
2018-11-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a prosecutor is acting as an "advocate"
and is entitled to absolute immunity when the
prosecutor performs an investigation and provides
those investigatory materials to a law enforcement
officer.
Whether a prosecutor is entitled to absolute
immunity when the prosecutor provides legal advice,
including legal advice as to the existence of probable
cause, to a law enforcement officer.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a prosecutor is acting as an 'advocate' and is entitled to absolute immunity when the prosecutor performs an investigation and provides those investigatory materials to a law enforcement officer
Docket Entries
2018-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.
2018-10-12
Waiver of right of respondent Marilyn Mosby to respond filed.
2018-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2018)
2018-07-31
Application (18A101) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until October 4, 2018.
2018-07-26
Application (18A101) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 5, 2018 to October 4, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Edward Michael Nero, et al.
Catherine Flynn — THE LAW FIRM OF CATHERINE FLYNN, Petitioner
Marilyn Mosby
Karl Aram Pothier — Office of the Maryland Attorney General, Respondent