Whether a judgment obtained by fraud on a
court must be set aside pursuant to Hazel-Atlas Glass
Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238 (1944) and
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d)(3) where the party who obtained
the judgment perpetrated related frauds on a federal
agency and Congress.

Whether an attorney must be implicated in his
client's fraud on the court in order for a judgment to
be set aside pursuant to Hazel-Atlas and Fed. R. Civ.
P. 60(d)(3).

Whether an attorney who helps his client
obtain a judgment by perpetrating a fraud on a court
must be counsel of record in that court in order for the
judgment to be set aside pursuant to Hazel-Atlas and
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d)(3).

Whether an attorney who helps his client
obtain a judgment by perpetrating a fraud on a court,
who is not counsel of record in that court, must
actively participate in the litigation in order for the
judgment to be set aside pursuant to Hazel-Atlas and
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d)(3).

Whether a fraud on the court must be
intentionally false in order to set aside a judgment
pursuant to Hazel-Atlas and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d)(3) or
will conduct that is wilfully blind to the truth or is in
reckless disregard for the truth suffice.

Whether a judgment obtained by fraud on a court must be set aside