No. 18-399
John W. Fink v. J. Philip Kirchner, et al.
Relisted (2)
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process judicial-error jury-trial standing summary-judgment trial-by-jury
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Because of the numerous, fundamental and pervasive errors and omissions committed by the district court, and because the court of appeals affirmed the district court's decision for substantially the same reasons, did the court of appeals abdicated its responsibility to
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals abdicated its responsibility to conduct a plenary review and thereby improperly denied the petitioner of his constitutional right to trial by jury
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-12-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-01
Reply of petitioner John Fink filed.
2018-10-23
Brief of respondents J. Kirchner, et al. in opposition filed.
2018-09-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 29, 2018)
Attorneys
J. Kirchner, et al.
John Fink
John W. Fink — Petitioner