No. 18-395
Corning Optical Communications RF LLC v. PPC Broadband, Inc.
Amici (2)
Tags: civil-procedure egregious-conduct fee-shifting halo-standard halo-v-pulse intentional-knowing notice-requirement objective-reasonableness patent-damages willful-infringement
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities Patent Copyright JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Securities Patent Copyright JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2018-12-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. In determining whether to enhance damages for "egregious" infringement under §284, must courts consider all relevant circumstances, including evidence that the defendant's position was objectively reasonable?
2. Does a finding of willful infringement based on a "should have known" standard violate the requirement that willfulness be "intentional or knowing"?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether courts must consider all relevant circumstances, including evidence that the defendant's position was objectively reasonable, in determining whether to enhance damages for 'egregious' infringement under §284
Docket Entries
2018-12-10
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-20
Reply of petitioner Corning Optical Communications RF LLC filed.
2018-11-05
Brief of respondent PPC Broadband, Inc. in opposition filed.
2018-10-29
Brief amicus curiae of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. filed.
2018-10-29
Brief amicus curiae of Askeladden L.L.C. filed.
2018-10-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 5, 2018.
2018-10-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 29, 2018 to November 5, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-09-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 29, 2018)
2018-08-03
Application (18A128) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 27, 2018.
2018-08-02
Application (18A128) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 12, 2018 to September 27, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Askeladden L.L.C.
Gregory Hayes Lantier — Wilmer Cutler Pickering, Amicus
Corning Optical Communications RF LLC
Kimball R. Anderson — Winston & Strawn, Petitioner
PPC Broadband, Inc.
John Michael Jakes — Finnegan, Henderson, et al., Respondent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.