No. 18-39
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-convictions criminal-registration due-process ex-post-facto in-person-appearance offender-registration punishment punitive-law registration-statutes retroactive-application retroactivity statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-12-07
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the requirement of frequent, in-person reporting renders an offender-registration law punitive, such that applying the law retroactively violates the Ex Post Facto Clause.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the requirement of frequent, in-person reporting renders an offender-registration law punitive, such that applying the law retroactively violates the Ex Post Facto Clause
Docket Entries
2018-12-10
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-28
Rescheduled.
2018-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-02
Reply of petitioner Jason Lee Boyd filed.
2018-10-22
Brief of respondent State of Washington in opposition filed.
2018-09-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 22, 2018.
2018-09-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 1, 2018 to October 22, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-08-30
Response Requested. (Due October 1, 2018)
2018-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-13
Waiver of right of respondent Washington to respond filed.
2018-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 6, 2018)
Attorneys
Jason Lee Boyd
Lila J. Silverstein — Washington Appellate Project, Petitioner
State of Washington
Arne Orlando Denny — Skagit County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent
Washington
Erik Pedersen — Skagit County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent