No. 18-384
Papierfabrik August Koehler SE v. United States, et al.
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-record adverse-facts-available antidumping-duty commerce-department corroboration facts-available judicial-review statutory-interpretation tariff-act
Latest Conference:
2019-03-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a court may rely on the Tariff Act's perceived purpose to override its specific statutory requirements for selecting antidumping duty rates.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court may rely on the Tariff Act's perceived purpose to override its specific statutory requirements for selecting antidumping duty rates
Docket Entries
2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-08
Reply of petitioner Papierfabrik August Koehler SE filed.
2019-01-25
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-12-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 25, 2019.
2018-12-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 26, 2018 to January 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-11-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 26, 2018 to December 26, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-11-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 26, 2018.
2018-10-25
Brief amici curiae of Professors of Law filed.
2018-10-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 26, 2018.
2018-10-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 25, 2018 to November 26, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-09-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 25, 2018)
2018-07-13
Application (18A42) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 21, 2018.
2018-07-09
Application (18A42) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 24, 2018 to September 21, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Papierfabrik August Koehler SE
Michael Hugh McGinley — Dechert LLP, Petitioner
Professors of Law
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent