No. 18-366
Roberta Golden, et vir v. George Peterson
Tags: contract due-process equitable-principles foreclosure fraud fraudulent-mortgage legal-mandates mortgage mortgage-fraud property-rights real-property standing
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Were Petitioners denied due process when the state refused to allow Petitioners to have a hearing on the nature of the illegality and instead conflated equitable principles with legal mandates to preclude any hearing. The result is the enforcement of an illegal contract involving a fraudulent mortgage on the subject real property and the pending loss of the property in a foreclosure sale.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Were Petitioners denied due process when the state refused to allow Petitioners to have a hearing on the nature of the illegality and instead conflated equitable principles with legal mandates to preclude any hearing
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 22, 2018)
Attorneys
Robert Golden, et al.
Roberta Golden — Petitioner