No. 18-319
E. & J. Gallo Winery, et al. v. Refugio Arreguin
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)
Tags: arbitrability circuit-court-split circuit-split class-arbitration federal-arbitration-act gateway-question gateway-question-of-arbitrability oxford-health-plans oxford-health-plans-v-sutter stolt-nielsen stolt-nielsen-v-animalfeeds supreme-court-precedent
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a court, or an arbitrator, decides whether an arbitration agreement permits class arbitration.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court, or an arbitrator, decides whether an arbitration agreement permits class arbitration
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-01-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-14
Reply of petitioners E. & J. Gallo Winery, et al. filed.
2019-01-14
Supplemental brief of petitioners E. & J. Gallo Winery, et al. filed.
2019-01-02
Brief of respondent Refugio Arreguin in opposition filed.
2018-11-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 2, 2019.
2018-11-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 30, 2018 to December 31, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-10-31
Response Requested. (Due November 30, 2018)
2018-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.
2018-10-12
Waiver of right of respondent Refugio Arreguin to respond filed.
2018-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 12, 2018)
Attorneys
E. & J. Gallo Winery, et al.
Paul William Cane Jr. — Paul Hastings LLP, Petitioner
Refugio Arreguin
Ryan H. Wu — Capstone Law APC, Respondent