No. 18-314
Capella Photonics, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., et al.
Amici (1)Response Waived
Tags: 35-usc-144 appellate-review due-process federal-circuit judicial-procedure judicial-review mandamus patent-appeals patent-law patent-trial-and-appeal-board statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2018-11-02
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Federal Circuit's practice of routinely issuing judgments without opinions in appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board violates 35 U.S.C. § 144, which provides that the Federal Circuit "shall issue . . . its mandate and opinion" in such appeals.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Federal Circuit's practice of routinely issuing judgments without opinions in appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board violates 35 U.S.C. § 144
Docket Entries
2018-11-05
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-11
Brief amici curiae of US Inventor, Inc. and Eleven Affected Inventors filed.
2018-10-09
Waiver of right of respondents Lumentum Holdings Inc., Lumentum Inc., and Lumentum Operations LLC to respond filed.
2018-10-05
Waiver of right of respondent Ciena Corporation to respond filed.
2018-10-04
Waiver of right of respondent Cisco Systems, Inc. to respond filed.
2018-10-04
Waiver of right of respondent Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. to respond filed.
2018-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 11, 2018)
2018-07-05
Application (18A6) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 6, 2018.
2018-06-28
Application (18A6) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 8, 2018 to September 6, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Capella Photonics, Inc.
Robert Greene Sterne — Sterne, Kessler, et al., Petitioner
Ciena Corporation
Matthew J. Moore — Latham & Watkins, Respondent
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Aaron Michael Streett — Baker Botts, L.L.P., Respondent
Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.
Nathaniel Thomas Browand — Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, Respondent
Lumentum Holdings Inc., Lumentum Inc., and Lumentum Operations LLC
Joel David Sayres — Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Respondent
US Inventor, Inc. and Eleven Affected Inventors