No. 18-305
Kenda Kirby v. Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina
Tags: ada civil-rights due-process educational-amendments eleventh-amendment equal-protection first-amendment retaliation sex-based-characteristics sex-discrimination standing title-ix
Latest Conference:
2018-11-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Broadly, questions raised by the case include whether Plaintiff has a right to redress (both for discrimination and retaliation) under Title IX of the Educational Amendments Act of 1972 or other policies and statutes,
Whether Title IX and other civil rights/ non-discrimination statutes should be interpreted to encompass the full range of sex based physical characteristics, and -
Whether the Eleventh Amendment should be overturned.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether plaintiff has a right to redress discrimination and retaliation under Title IX or other policies and statutes
Docket Entries
2018-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.
2018-08-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 11, 2018)
Attorneys
Kenda Kirby
Kenda R. Kirby — Petitioner