No. 18-252
Real Estate Alliance Ltd. v. Move, Inc., et al.
Relisted (2)
Tags: 35-usc-101 alice-corp-v-cls-bank alice-test alice-v-cls-bank computer-user-interface fact-finding federal-circuit inventive-concept patent-claims patent-eligibility patent-infringement patent-law well-understood-routine-and-conventional
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is whether an ordered combination of elements in a patent claim is "well-understood, routine and conventional" to a skilled artisan in the relevant field under Alice step two a question of fact?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an ordered combination of elements in a patent claim is 'well-understood, routine and conventional' to a skilled artisan in the relevant field under Alice step two is a question of fact
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Motion of Mark Tornetta for leave to intervene to file a petition for rehearing DENIED.
2018-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-30
Motion of Mark Tornetta for leave to intervene to file a petition for rehearing.
2018-11-05
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-12
Reply of petitioner Real Estate Alliance LTD. filed.
2018-09-27
Brief of respondents Move, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
2018-08-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 27, 2018)
2018-06-25
Application (17A1385) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 27, 2018.
2018-06-15
Application (17A1385) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 28, 2018 to August 27, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Mark Tornetta
Mark Tornetta — Amicus
Move, Inc., et al.
Henrik Davidson Parker — Baker & Hostetler, LLP, Respondent
Real Estate Alliance LTD.
Lawrence Alan Husick — Lipton, Weinberger & Husick, Petitioner