No. 18-204
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Iris Pounds, et al.
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure federal-jurisdiction fraud independent-action independent-actions lack-of-jurisdiction rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court-judgment state-court-judgments subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2018-11-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the Rooker-Feldman doctrine prohibit a federal district court from exercising jurisdiction over an independent action challenging the validity of a prior state-court judgment for lack of jurisdiction, when a state trial court could do so?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Rooker-Feldman doctrine prohibit a federal district court from exercising jurisdiction over an independent action challenging the validity of a prior state-court judgment for lack of jurisdiction, when a state trial court could do so?
Docket Entries
2018-11-19
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-31
Reply of petitioner Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC filed. (Distributed)
2018-10-17
Brief of respondents Iris Pounds, et al. in opposition filed.
2018-09-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 17, 2018.
2018-09-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 17, 2018 to October 17, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-08-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 17, 2018)
Attorneys
Iris Pounds, et al.
Richard Brooks Glazier — The North Carolina Justice Center, Respondent
Portfolio Recovery Associates
Jonathan A. Berkelhammer — Ellis & Winters LLP, Petitioner