Samuel David Silva-Ramirez v. Hospital Espanol Auxilio Mutuo de Puerto Rico, Inc., et al.
1. How can be properly submitted to the rigors of the dispositive effects of materiality standard of False Claims Act [FCA] violations ; something hidden to the eyes of Federal agencies, and by sophistication of theories, complex legal structures and technicalities, they have defeated the basic principle of justice in the False Claims Act when Hospital Espanol Auxilio Mutuo [HEAM] of Puerto Rico, Inc. and the owners of HEAM ; La Sociedad Espanola de Auxilio Mutuo [SEAM] ; found the simplest way to circumvent justice, which is to hide with the truth?
2. Does a practice that unduly burdens the practice of religion, without a compell ing interest, even though it might be neutral on its face, would it be unconsti tutional?
How can be properly submitted to the rigors of the dispositive effects of materiality standard of False Claims Act [FCA] violations; something hidden to the eyes of Federal agencies, and by sophistication of theories, complex legal structures and technicalities, they have defeated the basic principle of justice in the False Claims Act when Hospital Espanol Auxilio Mutuo [HEAM] of Puerto Rico, Inc. and the owners of HEAM; La Sociedad Espanola de Auxilio Mutuo [SEAM]; found the simplest way to circumvent justice, which is to hide with the truth?