No. 18-165
DHL Supply Chain v. DEX Systems, Inc.
Tags: calder-effects-test civil-procedure due-process electronic-server foreign-defendant forum-state internet-jurisdiction jurisdictional-analysis long-arm-statute minimum-contacts personal-jurisdiction specific-jurisdiction virtual-presence
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
After Walden v. Fiore, 571 U.S. 277 (2014), may a United States court exercise personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant where that defendant's only "virtual presence" in the forum was through electronic access to a server that the plaintiff chose to host in the forum?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a U.S. court can exercise personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant based solely on the defendant's 'virtual presence' through electronic access to a server in the forum state
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-10-22
Brief of respondent DEX Systems, Inc. and supplemental appendix in opposition filed.
2018-10-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 22, 2018. See Rule 30.1.
2018-10-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 11, 2018 to October 21, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-09-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 11, 2018.
2018-09-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 27, 2018 to October 11, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-08-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 27, 2018.
2018-08-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 6, 2018 to September 27, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-08-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 6, 2018)
Attorneys
DEX Systems, Inc.
Claude Stuart Young — Data Exchange Corporation, Respondent
DHL Supply Chain
Anthony C. White — Thompson Hine LLP, Petitioner