No. 18-1577
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)
Tags: 4th-amendment 4th-amendment-law civil-rights conflict-with-other-jurisdictions fourth-amendment investigative-detention law-enforcement-encounter pennsylvania-supreme-court probable-cause reasonable-suspicion seizure terry-stop traffic-stop
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
The question presented is whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court erred in finding that Adams was subjected to an unreasonable seizure in violation of the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court erred in finding that Adams was subjected to an unreasonable seizure in violation of the 4th Amendment
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2019-11-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-04
Brief of respondent Edward Adams in opposition filed.
2019-11-04
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Edward Adams.
2019-09-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 4, 2019.
2019-09-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 3, 2019 to November 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-09-03
Response Requested. (Due October 3, 2019)
2019-07-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-23
Waiver of right of respondent Edward Adams to respond filed.
2019-06-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Edward Adams
Robert E. Mielnicki — Robert E. Mielnicki, Esquire, Respondent