Does the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal's precedent that all Chapter 13 debtors have a continuing duty to disclose all post-confirmation claims offend the First and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution because it contravenes clear and unambiguous law and regulations granting some Chapter 13 debtors standing to pursue all post-confirmation claims without the court's permission?

If a debtor has standing to pursue a post-confirmation claim without court permission, does this standing overcome judicial estoppel issues?

If a debtor is in compliance with bankruptcy code and regulations, and if the confirmed plan to which he is bound does not require disclosure of post-confirmation claims, is it possible that he can be said to have taken an inconsistent position for his nondisclosure of a post-confirmation claim?

Does the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal's precedent that all Chapter 13 debtors have a continuing duty to disclose all post-confirmation claims offend the First and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution?