No. 18-155
James H. Brady v. Associated Press Telecom, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: accountability civil-procedure civil-rights contract-interference due-process first-amendment free-speech judicial-misconduct media media-liability press-freedom standing takings
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment DueProcess SecondAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
FirstAmendment DueProcess SecondAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Was it wrong and a direct conflict with this Court when the Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court Decision that stated that News Agencies have a First Amendment right to hide the crimes of those in power and have no duty to hold those in power accountable if they wish to keep the crimes of those in power hidden from public scrutiny?
2. Can the victim of a crime hold the press liable for colluding by hiding the crimes by those in power?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether news agencies have a First Amendment right to hide crimes of those in power and avoid holding them accountable
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-17
Waiver of right of respondents Associated Press Telecom, et al. to respond filed.
2018-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent New York Times Company to respond filed.
2018-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 4, 2018)
Attorneys
Associated Press Telecom, et al.
Katherine M. Bolger — Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Respondent
James H. Brady
James H. Brady — Petitioner
New York Times Company
David E. McCraw — The New York Times Company, Respondent